Comments on: Intel Bay Trail Silvermont Powered Atom Z3000 Series Gets Performance Exposé

By: John

John — Tue, 03 Sep 2013 04:55:00 +0000

Aha ha ha. So misleading… Why is Intel comparing the Bay Trail with old ARM chips for 3D gaming?? Because according to THIS INDEPENDENT review Snapdragon 800 is 8.2 times faster than Atom Z2760 which makes it 1.7 times FASTER than Bay trail!

http://www.notebookcheck.net/SoC-Shootout-x86-vs-ARM.99496.0.html

By: Wayne

Wayne — Mon, 02 Sep 2013 14:02:00 +0000

They could very well be a great alternative to Snapdragon. Rumour has it that Intel knows a little bit about processors… x86 that is. What interests me more than anything is the cost.

By: Ryan Martin

Ryan Martin — Sat, 31 Aug 2013 13:09:00 +0000

In reply to hdvhdv. Intel has never really specified this which is very annoying. They just say typically less than 2W.

By: hdvhdv

hdvhdv — Sat, 31 Aug 2013 11:32:00 +0000

Nice, but the most interesting graph is not there, how much power do these things consume???
If this is not comparable to the Qualcomm or Tegra 4 than it counts for nothing.

As mentioned in the article , very PR driven graphs in one chart having a Tegra 3 an in another the new Tegra 4…